Texas Workforce Housing Coalition

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
392483994
IRS 990 coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Phone
5125885850
Rating
43
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,444,560
Expenses
$1,987,153
Assets
$453,283
Liabilities
$995,876

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jason Post (Director & President)

People named in this filing

  • Jason Post (Director & President)
  • John Jeter (Director)
  • Adam Chrisakis (Director & Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create and preserve affordable housing for low and middle-income texans priced out of their communities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Provision of information: a. The organization provides information to interested parties regarding the status of legislation and the litigation efforts of Texas Workforce Housing Coalition affecting the affordable housing industry in Texas, including but not limited to challenging AMENDMENTS TO Texas Government Code 394 et seq., WHICH AMENDED THE ELIGIBILITY AND AFFORDABILITY REQUIREMENTS BY WHICH TAX EXEMPTIONS UNDER THE STATUTE WERE GRANTED TO INCENTIVIZE THE OWNERSHIP, DEVELOPMENT, AND OPERATION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN TEXAS. b. Employees of an affiliate of A member of the organization conduct this activity. c. This activity is conducted via phone and email, proactively providing information and responding to requests. d. Approximately 25% of the organization's time is allocated to this activity. This will increase as the organization moves past bringing in new sponsors. e. Because the employees conducting this activity are currently employed by an affiliate of A member of the organization, this activity is presently funded by that affiliate. However, the organization intends to hire its own employees in the future, and such employees' compensation will be paid with sponsor dues. Approximately 5% of the organization's expenses will be allocated to this activity. f. This activity furthers the exempt purpose of the organization by promoting both the affordable housing industry in Texas and the importance of the organization's efforts in supporting it. In particular, this activity works to ensure the ongoing engagement of sponsors by keeping the sponsors apprised of the organization's ongoing activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 76
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -37.6%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.23; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.2; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $2M reported
  • Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.