Texas Water Utility Assoc Sam Houston District
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742769764
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2023, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Houston, TX, USA
- Phone
- 7139833192
- Rating
- 63
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $50,519
- Expenses
- $55,475
- Assets
- $84,509
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PAT GRAY (Past President)
- SCOTT SPIDLE (2ND V.PRESIDENT)
- LAURA BONJONIA (President)
- ROY ARISTIZABAL (President-Elect)
- BEN CONNELLEY (PAST-PRESIDENT)
- STEVEN KENNEY (PAST-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PAT GRAY (Past President)
- SCOTT SPIDLE (2ND V.PRESIDENT)
- LAURA BONJONIA (President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Water & sewer utility education
What it reported doing in 2023
Publication of news letter - benefets all members ( appox 425) includes technical information employment opportunities & annouces up coming meeting & events
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 38
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55.4%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 50.4%; rating input score 50
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.8%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.52; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.5% per year; rating input score 0; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -9.7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 55.4% of revenue deployed · 50.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $28K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2021 to 2023
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.