Texas Statewide Network of Assessment Professionals
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 261741278
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- Austin, TX, USA
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $144,636
- Expenses
- $115,915
- Assets
- $312,727
- Liabilities
- $18,287
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Dr Jennifer Tracy (President)
- Carin Adermann (Vice President)
- Kelly Bertholf (Immediate Past President)
People named in this filing
- Dr Jennifer Tracy (President)
- Carin Adermann (Vice President)
- Kathy Conring (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Texas Statewide Network of Assessment Professionals TSNAP was formed in 2000 to support the professional needs of student assessment professionals throughout Texas. TSNAP exists to provide opportunities for members to grow learn and support one another in the areas of assessment and accountability. The organization fulfills this purpose by informing members on student assessment news and developments facilitating knowledge-sharing and networking providing professional training and connecting members to relevant resources. TSNAP aspires to develop a collaborative community of professionals who demonstrate the knowledge skills and values needed to inspire leadership across the field of educational assessment in Texas.
What it reported doing in 2025
New District Testing Coordinator Academy: Provides foundational training and support for newly appointed District Test Coordinators DTC and assistants across Texas. The program is designed to equip new coordinators with the knowledge and skills necessary to successfully manage district-level assessment responsibilities from the outset of their role. This event directly benefits new testing coordinators and by extension the students and campuses they serve.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 50
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 46.3%; rating input score 46
- Program expense ratio: 57.8%; rating input score 58
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 19.9%; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.7; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 10.2% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 46.3% of revenue deployed · 57.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $67K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 25 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2015 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.