Texas State Association of Occupational Health Nurses Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 756044633
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2146622888
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $4,075
- Expenses
- $10,388
- Assets
- $148,308
- Liabilities
- $3,700
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Hilda Wist (President/Treas)
People named in this filing
- Hilda Wist (President/Treas)
- Dr Julia Reyes (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Constitute the professional association of registered nurses engaged in the practice of occupational health nursing; promote and provide continuing education in occupational health nursing for members; maintain the integrity and character of the nursing profession; improve community health by providing quality nursing service to workers; promote standards for occupational health nurses and occupational health nursing services; advance the profession through discussion of issues in the field of occupational nursing; promote health and safety of workers and support occupational health nursing practice through monitoring and influencing legislation and regulations; stimulate occupational health nurse participation in all nursing activities-local, state, regional, and national; and to do with the limits of the law all things necessary, proper, incidental, suitable, useful and conducive to complete accomplishment of the foregoing purposes.
What it reported doing in 2024
Various conferences, seminars and workshops held during the year to update members on various new methods and technologies in the health nursing field
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -154.9%; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.28; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -29% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -20.8% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.