Texas Society of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgeons

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
741701940
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
San Antonio, TX, USA
Phone
2109880960
Rating
70
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$270,390
Expenses
$228,328
Assets
$160,026
Liabilities
$11,892

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN V SHROYER DDS (PRESIDENT)
  • STEVE L KOO DDS MS (PRESIDENT-EL)

People named in this filing

  • JOHN V SHROYER DDS (PRESIDENT)
  • NATASH FURTCHGOTT DDS (SECRETARY/TR)
  • NATASHA FURCHTGOTT DDS (VICE PRESIDE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of the Texas society of oral and maxillofacial surgeons is to continually enhance the quality and value of health care. To achieve this mission the society embraces the following methods: "promoting optimal patient care according to the guidelines outlined in the parameters of care, developed by and for the specialty of oral and maxillofacial surgery. "maintaining the specialty's position as the pre-eminent provider of oral and maxillofacial surgical care. "establishing and maintaining a state organization of the highest caliber that serves all eligible oral and maxillofacial surgeons in Texas. "maintaining a strong and open communication between the academic community and private sector to provide the highest quality care to all patients. "ensuring optimal patient care by requiring that each member completes the office anesthesia evaluation every five years. "educating the citizens of the state of Texas regarding the advanced training, qualifications, and scope of practice

What it reported doing in 2025

Contribute to the general health and welfare of the citizens of Texas by educating the people of the state regarding the specific advanced training, qualifications and functions of those dentists who practice oral and maxillofacial surgery on an exclusive basis; to promote and encourage the advancement of the practice of oral and maxillofacial surgery to the highest standards and quality, to the end that the relations of the profession with the public shall be worthy of full confidence; to encourage the members to discharge their civic and professional responsibilities to the community; and to provide among its members opportunities for social and professional community.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 90
  • Accountability: 64
  • Sustainability: 51
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 68.6%; rating input score 69
  • Program expense ratio: 81.3%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.6%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.1% per year; rating input score 0; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.9% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 68.6% of revenue deployed · 81.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 22 of 22 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.