Texas Rural Health Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742530131
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Abilene, TX, USA
- Phone
- 3256720495
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $173,722
- Expenses
- $152,966
- Assets
- $107,675
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Courtney West (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- Courtney West (PRESIDENT)
- Candy Powell (TREASURER)
- Kelly Cheek (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote rural health as a major concern in Texas. Serve as a strong, unifying voice for those working to improve rural health statewide. Advocate for rural health and improved health systems for rural texans. Provide a forum to exchange information and ideas for rural health improvements.
What it reported doing in 2024
RURAL HEALTH ADVOCAVY & POLICY WORKlegislative advocacy efforts, policy development, stakeholder engagement, and represtation of rural healthinterests at the state and federal levels. Member base is 278 members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 70% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 29
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 45
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 27.6%; rating input score 28
- Program expense ratio: 31.4%; rating input score 31
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 11.9%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 31.7%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.5% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 27.6% of revenue deployed · 31.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $48K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 31/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.