Texas Recreational Vehicle Association - Rio Grande Valley Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
010692163
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2018
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
Mission, TX, USA
Phone
9565854481
Rating
59
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,588
Expenses
$8,020
Assets
$45,865

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • John Dearinger (President)
  • Salome Wellaver (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • John Dearinger (President)
  • Marie Howard (Secretary)
  • Allen Gooding (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization was formed to promote the use of recreational vehicles and to provide local dealers with a resource group for sharing information and solving problems related to recreational vehicles. A "Recreational Vehicle Show" was held where members displayed their products and where the public was able to compare products side-by-side. Members distributed information about "RV Living".

What it reported doing in 2018

Our purpose is to promote the use of recreational vehicles and to provide local dealers with a resource group for sharing information and solving problems related to recreational vehicles. A "Recreational Vehicle Show" was held where members displayed their products and where the public was able to compare products side-by-side. Members distributed information about "RV Living".

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 48
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 36
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.3%; rating input score 76
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -74.8%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.72; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -89.3% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -45% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.3% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2015 to 2018
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.