Texas Professional Healthcare Alliance Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
760396818
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2023
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2023
Location
Stilwell, KS, USA
Phone
7133442404
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$20,658
Expenses
$17,516
Assets
$20,099
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Ken Klingensmith (President)
  • Leroy Sterling MD (Board President)
  • Victor Cumagun MD (Board Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Ken Klingensmith (President)
  • Leroy Sterling MD (Board President)
  • Victor Cumagun MD (Board Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide support and service to the physician and healthcare providers, each individually providing healthcare services to patients. Membership is limited to healthcare providers collectively having a common interest in being in a network with managed care organizations and desiring to lower their medical practice expenses through group purchasing initiatives.

What it reported doing in 2023

Expense Reduction - To identify and facilitate group purchasing opportunities allowing the individual members to realize discounts and savings as being part of a larger group from what otherwise alone they may not be able to realize. Savings on medical supplies, office supplies, merchant card services, and other vendor services that support their practice operations. Members benefit from access to the negotiated savings arrangement, but each holds an agreement or contract with the vendors directly.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.2%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.15; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 42.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.1% per year; rating input score 0; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.3% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2014 to 2023
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 49/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.