Texas Muslim Women's Foundation
Legal name: Texas Muslim Womens Foundation Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 203060929
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2013–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Plano, TX, US
- Phone
- 469.467.6241
- Rating
- 87
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
- Affiliation
- Islam
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,895,767
- Expenses
- $3,909,413
- Assets
- $1,719,899
- Liabilities
- $482,082
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- MONA KAFEEL (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- MONA KAFEEL (CEO): $127,949 total reported compensation
- SHERNAZ MOHANTY (FINANCE DIR.): $103,615 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to educate, assist, and uplift individuals and families through domestic violence awareness, community engagement, and essential support services.
What it reported doing in 2025
TRANSITIONAL HOUSING & RAPID RE-HOUSING: TH ensures safe and stable housing while empowering clients to become self-sufficient. TMWF provides 5 short-term housing units through HUD which provides rent-free housing for 90 days and 5 additional units through VAWA funding for longer stays of up to one year dependent on the survivors needs. In 2025, TMWFs TH program collectively housed 95 survivors.The RRH program enables families and individuals experiencing homelessness due to domestic violence to move into permanent housing for up to 12 months, as well as receive targeted services. Clients receive financial literacy and empowerment through ancillary services and support for partial rent and partial utilities while income eligibility applies under HUD standards. In 2025, RRH services housed 68 survivors.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 78% for direct work, and 22% for grants.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 81
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 25
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.3%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 83%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $23.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.44; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.9%; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 12.2% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 83.3% of revenue deployed · 83% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 11 of 11 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported · 3 of 6 affiliation controls reported
- Programs: 7 filed program accomplishments · $3.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 37 of 37 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 25/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 14/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 28/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 51/100.