Texas Mental Health Resources
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 863571657
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2020
- Location
- Arlington, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8175017337
- Rating
- 95
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $74,431
- Expenses
- $81,511
- Assets
- $25,882
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Donovan Fredricksen (President)
People named in this filing
- Donovan Fredricksen (President)
- Kelli Fredricksen (Director)
- William Alan Brown (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide intervention, advocacy, and support for individuals and families struggling with mental health issues. In practical terms, this purpose is played out through three primary activities: 1) creating mental health support groups, 2) partnering with/training organizations and people on mental health needs, and 3) providing financial help for those who cannot afford mental health costs.
What it reported doing in 2025
PROGRAM SERVICE 2: Create partnerships with civic and religious organizations to provide training on effectively serving needs of those with mental health issues. Though the organization is fairly young, we already have active partnerships with dozens of organizations, with many more promising connections from which to develop additional partnerships in 2026. As the primary voice of the organization, the president is actively participating in speaking engagements throughout the year to Rotary Clubs, hospitals, churches, and other civic organizations, each of which has the potential for training and advocacy partnerships. With senior adults being a primary area of concern for mental health issues, it is exciting to have sponsored and orchestrated a number of activities at 3 senior facilities in 2025. The president has completed a third year personally leading a support group in the organization's home office city, with dozens of participants heralding it as the stabilizing group that keeps them moving forward with their mental health. TXMHR's president is also reaching out to other age groups, most recently focusing on teenage mental health and beginning conversations with two different charter school systems regarding starting after-school mental health programs for their students. This would ultimately also allow the organization to reach out to provide support to the families of these students. The president's minimal salary expense has been divided evenly over each of the program service expense areas because without his work in these areas none of the accomplishments would have occurred. His work actually IS the service being provided. TXMHR's goal moving forward in 2026 and beyond will be to raise financial resources that will allow the organization the ability to have one full-time paid staff person (the president) in order to open wide the door for mental health service.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 98
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 95.2%; rating input score 95
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.5%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 74.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 58.5% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 36% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.5% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 95.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $78K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.