Texas Health Resources

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
752770738
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Jul 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
Location
Arlington, TX, United States
Phone
1-682-236-5200
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospital, General
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$570,041,068
Expenses
$478,106,717
Assets
$276,236,311
Liabilities
$48,650,793

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

34 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • BerdanBarclay E (THR CEO/Trustee)
  • HayFraser Scott (President THP)

Highest reported compensation

  • BerdanBarclay E (THR CEO/Trustee): $5,590,405 total reported compensation
  • KramerKenneth J (Assistant Secretary): $1,617,416 total reported compensation
  • FlorenJoshua Andrew (Former Officer): $1,081,755 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Mission: To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve. Texas Health enables employees to contribute their time and talents to area nonprofit organizations that align with our mission, vision and values. Our Community Time Off program compensates every participating full and part-time employee for one regularly scheduled workday each year to provide community service. Girl Swinging Community Health Improvement. The potential of our community lies in the health and well-being of all who live here. Texas Health Community Hope engages with area leaders, caregivers, and other stakeholders to deliver on Texas Health’s Mission of “Improving the health of the people in the communities we serve.” Group in garden Texas Health is committed to delivering support through programs and services that help lead to measurable, sustainable community improvements. We serve as a...

What it reported doing in 2024

Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Plano ("THP") is a 386-bed facility that has served the cities of Plano and surrounding communities since its opening in 1991. A destination for high acuity neurosurgery, stroke, heart and vascular, and orthopedic care, THP is designated as a Primary Heart Attack Center, Comprehensive Stroke Center, and holds Advanced Certification for Total Hip and Knee Replacement from The Joint Commission. In addition to prioritizing these services, the Magnet-designated hospital places a focus on breast care, cancer care, digestive health, and women & infant's care, among other service lines. Texas Health Seay Behavioral Health Plano, located on the campus, provides inpatient and outpatient behavioral health therapies. A Level II Trauma Center, THP also holds Level IV Comprehensive Maternal Care and Level IV NICU Advanced designations. To keep up with rapid growth in Collin County, Texas Health is investing into the facility, adding an eight-story bed tower. See "SYSTEM FACILITIES AND OPERATIONS OVERVIEW - Strategic Plans and Recent Developments" herein for further details on the expansion. THP has more than 1,700 employees and over 1,300 physicians on its medical staff in more than 65 specialties. During this year, THP had 101,627 patient days, 19,886 discharges, 3,100 births, 95,572 outpatient encounters, and 54,850 emergency room visit. THP provides quality medical healthcare services regardless of the patient's race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, age, or ability to pay. THP provides care to persons covered by governmental programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, for reimbursement that does not always cover the cost of providing the care. THP also provides charity care to patients who are unable to pay for the services they receive.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 67
  • Transparency & Controls: 64
  • Accountability: 79
  • Sustainability: 62
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.7%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 55.7%; rating input score 56; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.1%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.58; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.4%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6.3% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 2 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 69.7% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $397.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $5.6M · 34 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $105.7M reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 15 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 82 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 56/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.