Texas Health Resources
Legal name: Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 432008974
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2023
- Location
- Arlington, TX, United States
- Phone
- 1-877-847-9355
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospitals and Related Primary Medical Care Facilities
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $295,574,856
- Expenses
- $279,507,497
- Assets
- $236,417,922
- Liabilities
- $24,220,540
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
33 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BerdanBarclay E (THR CEO/Trustee)
- ReecerJeffrey P (President THDN)
Highest reported compensation
- BerdanBarclay E (THR CEO/Trustee): $5,590,405 total reported compensation
- KramerKenneth J (Assistant Secretary): $1,617,416 total reported compensation
- JacksonDavid W (Assistant Secretary): $834,928 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve. The potential of our community lies in the health and well-being of all who live here. Texas Health Community Hope engages with area leaders, caregivers, and other stakeholders to deliver on Texas Health’s Mission of “Improving the health of the people in the communities we serve.” Group in garden Texas Health is committed to delivering support through programs and services that help lead to measurable, sustainable community improvements. We serve as a catalyst to transform lives by investing in the vision of a healthier future for our communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Located in Denton Texas, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital Denton (THDN) is a hospital with 239 staffed beds featuring more than 43 specialties, accompanied by our patient-centered care model, which places the patient and family at the center of the decision-making process. THDN provides quality medical healthcare regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, age or ability to pay. The hospital provides care to persons covered by governmental programs including Medicare and Medicaid for reimbursement that does not always cover the cost of providing the care. Recognizing its mission to the community, services are provided to both financially indigent and medically indigent patients. THDN takes its responsibility to the community very seriously and invests charitable resources to promote good health and prevent disease. Not only does THDN provide health care to those who do not have the means to pay, it also conducts a variety of programs designed to improve health and prevent illness in the community. THDN's community benefit strategy includes confronting health problems at their source and emphasizes health promotion, disease prevention, and early treatment of illness. For example, THDN provides screenings and educational services for diseases that may not have early symptoms but that should be treated or managed early, such as diabetes, cancer and hypertension. THDN also provides free flu immunizations, targeting the uninsured and high-risk populations. Since improving community health also requires attention to accident prevention, THDN provides free programs such as, A Matter of Balance and our Car Seat Safety Check. A Matter of Balance is an evidenced based fall prevention program for older adults. The educational course is conducted over eight two-hour sessions to instill new habit-forming behaviors to reduce the risk of injury due to falls. Our Car Seat Safety Check is designed as an accident prevention program which uses car seats as a central safety issue in the lives of children and parents. Certified technicians train caregivers on the proper installation and maintenance of car seats, raise community awareness about child passenger safety and the risk of unintentional injury from motor vehicle collisions, and provide free car seats to those in need. The following is a sampling of some of the other community benefit activities provided in 2024: a. Below cost community education classes for breast feeding, childbirth, fall prevention, car seat safety, diabetes self-management, chronic disease self-management and first aid/CPR. b. Support groups for cancer survivors, persons with stroke, persons with chronic breathing problems and for persons with other chronic conditions. Families and caregivers are also encouraged to attend support group sessions. c. Screenings for skin cancer, glucose, blood pressure, prostate health and pulmonary function. d. Healthcare shadowing and mentoring programs for high school students. e. Education classes and training for nurse residencies -- partnerships with Texas Woman's University, University of Texas in Arlington, and North Central Texas College. f. Partnership with Texas Tech University, Creighton University, Midwestern State University, Tarleton State University, Texas Woman's University, University of North Texas, ABC Resources and North Central Texas College to include education classes and training for college/university students in pharmacy, radiology, surgical tech, lab, cardiac rehab and other allied health specialties. g. Support funding for clinics providing care for the uninsured and underinsured in Denton County. In 2024 THDN had 49,276 patient days, 12,067 discharges, 2,004 births, 74,948 outpatient encounters and 51,881 emergency room visits during the calendar year.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 71
- Transparency & Controls: 69
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.4%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 82.9%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 82%; rating input score 82; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.4%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.85; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 78.4% of revenue deployed · 82.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $231.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5.6M · 33 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $50.7M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 19 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 85 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 54/100.