Texas Health Resources
Legal name: Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Stephenville
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 751752253
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Arlington, TX, USA
- Phone
- 817-271-7028
- Rating
- 69
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $75,369,166
- Expenses
- $62,610,907
- Assets
- $48,115,289
- Liabilities
- $34,534,863
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
28 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BerdanBarclay E (THR CEO/Trustee)
- EisenmannClaudia A (President THS)
Highest reported compensation
- BerdanBarclay E (THR CEO/Trustee): $5,590,405 total reported compensation
- KramerKenneth J (Assistant Secretary): $1,617,416 total reported compensation
- JacksonDavid W (Assistant Secretary): $834,928 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve. The potential of our community lies in the health and well-being of all who live here. Texas Health Community Hope engages with area leaders, caregivers, and other stakeholders to deliver on Texas Health’s Mission of “Improving the health of the people in the communities we serve.” Group in garden Texas Health is committed to delivering support through programs and services that help lead to measurable, sustainable community improvements. We serve as a catalyst to transform lives by investing in the vision of a healthier future for our communities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Stephenville (THS) is an acute care, full-service hospital with 35 staffed and 35 available beds providing health care for residents in Erath and surrounding counties since 1982. THS offers health care services such as inpatient and outpatient surgery, women's services, advanced diagnostic imaging, inpatient physical therapy, wound care, and cardiac and pulmonary rehabilitation. THS has been recognized as a Nurse-Friendly and Baby-Friendly Hospital, operates a Level IV Trauma Center, and is designated as a Support (Level III) Stroke Facility. During the year, THS had 3,978 patient days, 1,678 discharges, 30,283 outpatient encounters, 18,969 emergency room visits and 369 births. THS provides quality medical healthcare regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, age, or ability to pay. The hospital provides care to persons covered by governmental programs including Medicare and Medicaid for reimbursement that does not always cover the cost of providing the care. Recognizing its mission to the community, services are provided to both financially indigent and medically indigent patients. Community benefit is provided through many reduced price services and free programs to the community. These services are essential to provide complete healthcare to the communities served. THS promotes Diabetes Self-Management, a program where the hospital's Center for Diabetes Education partners with physicians and other members of the community in an effort, through education and encouragement, to promote healthy lifestyles, good nutrition, the importance of exercise and the importance of early diabetes detection. THS provided car seat safety checks to Erath and surrounding counties as well as assisted with installing car seats safely and free of charge to those in need.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 68
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.6%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 82.6%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 74.9%; rating input score 75; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.9%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.72; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 7%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.8% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 68.6% of revenue deployed · 82.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $51.7M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5.6M · 28 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $17.9M reported
- Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 81 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.