Texas Health Resources
Legal name: Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Southwest Fort Worth
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 752678857
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Fort Worth, TX, United States
- Phone
- 1-877-847-9355
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $392,807,897
- Expenses
- $350,890,393
- Assets
- $225,884,351
- Liabilities
- $28,493,244
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BerdanBarclay E (THR CEO/Trustee)
- PaiAjith (President THSW)
Highest reported compensation
- BerdanBarclay E (THR CEO/Trustee): $5,590,405 total reported compensation
- KramerKenneth J (Assistant Secretary): $1,617,416 total reported compensation
- TuckerRebecca D (Former Officer): $960,949 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve. Texas Health enables employees to contribute their time and talents to area nonprofit organizations that align with our mission, vision and values. Our Community Time Off program compensates every participating full and part-time employee for one regularly scheduled workday each year to provide community service. Girl Swinging Community Health Improvement. The potential of our community lies in the health and well-being of all who live here. Texas Health Community Hope engages with area leaders, caregivers, and other stakeholders to deliver on Texas Health’s Mission of “Improving the health of the people in the communities we serve.” Group in garden Texas Health is committed to delivering support through programs and services that help lead to measurable, sustainable community improvements. We serve as a catalyst to...
What it reported doing in 2024
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Southwest Fort Worth ("THSW") is a 261-bed hospital serving the communities of Fort Worth, Benbrook, Crowley, Aledo and Granbury since 1987. Providing advanced medical treatments to Tarrant County and beyond, THSW received its first Magnet designation in 2016 and was redesignated in 2022. The facility also holds Primary Heart Attack Center and Primary Stroke Center designations from The Joint Commission. THSW is a Level III trauma center specializing in back and spine, heart and vascular, imaging services, orthopedic and sports medicine, among other key services. Expanding its NICU from 8 beds to 16 in April 2020, the hospital also holds Maternal and NICU Level III designations from the Texas Department of State Health Services. A third cardiac catheterization and electrophysiology lab opened on the hospital's campus in 2024. Texas Health Clearfork, which holds Advanced Certification for Total Hip and Knee Replacement, is part of THSW focused on joint replacement and back and spine care. More than 1,296 employees work at the hospital, and more than 635 physicians are practicing on the medical staff. During the year, THSW had 60,256 patient days, 15,616 discharges, 96,887 outpatient encounters, 71,377 emergency room visits and 3,022 births. THSW provides quality medical healthcare regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, age, or ability to pay. The hospital provides care to persons covered by governmental programs including Medicare and Medicaid for reimbursement that does not always cover the cost of providing the care. Recognizing its mission to the community, services are provided to both financially indigent and medically indigent patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 58
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 59
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 73.4%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 82.2%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 19.6%; rating input score 20; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.7%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.13; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 73.4% of revenue deployed · 82.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $288.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5.6M · 30 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $65.9M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 80 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 20/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 25/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.