Texas Health Resources Foundation
Legal name: Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Hurst-Euless-Bedford
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 751438726
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Arlington, TX, United States
- Phone
- 1-682-236-5200
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Hospital, General
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $359,625,016
- Expenses
- $328,796,068
- Assets
- $169,220,157
- Liabilities
- $25,836,652
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
31 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BerdanBarclay E (THR CEO/Trustee)
- SheltonJared Christopher (President THHEB Term 9/22/2024)
- Goertz Brandon R (President THHEB)
Highest reported compensation
- BerdanBarclay E (THR CEO/Trustee): $5,590,405 total reported compensation
- KramerKenneth J (Assistant Secretary): $1,617,416 total reported compensation
- SheltonJared Christopher (President THHEB Term 9/22/2024): $947,730 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To improve the health of the people in the communities we serve. Please provide us with your organization's Mission Statement. Target Population Demographics Please provide size and demographic information about the target audience served by your organization. (e.g., Gender, Ethnicity, Target age). Organization Mission Please provide us with your organization's Mission Statement. Target Population Demographics. The potential of our community lies in the health and well-being of all who live here. Texas Health Community Hope engages with area leaders, caregivers, and other stakeholders to deliver on Texas Health’s Mission of “Improving the health of the people in the communities we serve.” Group in garden Texas Health is committed to delivering support through programs and services that help lead to measurable, sustainable community improvements. We serve as a catalyst to transform...
What it reported doing in 2024
Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Hurst Euless Bedford ("THHEB") celebrated its 50th anniversary of providing Northeast Tarrant County with patient and family-centered care in 2023. The 275-bed acute care facility offers a broad range of inpatient and outpatient medical services with specialized capabilities in many areas, including emergency care, heart & vascular, orthopedics, women's and infant's and cancer care. In addition, behavioral health therapies are provided at an adjacent facility, Texas Health Springwood Behavioral Health HEB. THHEB is designated by the state as a Level III Trauma Center and holds a Level III Subspecialty Care Maternal designation. It is a Joint Commission Primary Heart Attack Center and Primary Stroke Center and achieved its first Magnet status in 2022. More than 1,300 employees work at the hospital, 24 Graduate Medical Education (GME) physicians, and more than 670 physicians are practicing on its medical staff. THHEB provides quality medical healthcare regardless of race, creed, sex, national origin, handicap, age, or ability to pay. The hospital provides care to persons covered by governmental programs including Medicare and Medicaid for reimbursement that does not always cover the cost of providing the care. Recognizing its mission to the community, services are provided to both financially indigent and medically indigent patients. During the year, THHEB had 67,324 patient days, 16,190 discharges, 75,134 outpatient encounters, 61,113 emergency room visits, 4,539 surgeries, and 2,384 births.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 66
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 54
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.3%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 82.4%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 66.6%; rating input score 67; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 80%; rating input score 80; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.6%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.51; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.8%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.8% per year; rating input score 100; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 75.3% of revenue deployed · 82.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 15 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $270.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5.6M · 31 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $60.5M reported
- Consistency: 32 of 33 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 83 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.