Texas Girls and Boys Ranch
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237292527
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Lubbock, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8067473187
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Group Homes
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $5,611,353
- Expenses
- $4,799,890
- Assets
- $7,200,255
- Liabilities
- $219,822
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOHN SIGLE (PRESIDENT)
- ROGER MAHAN (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- JOHN SIGLE (PRESIDENT): $121,868 total reported compensation
- ROGER MAHAN (VICE PRESIDENT): $88,953 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.
What it reported doing in 2024
Texas girls & boys ranch is a christ-centered, faith-based organization providing 24-hour residential care and professional counseling services for children through three licensed programs. The ranch is nationally accredited by the council on accreditation (coa) and integrates trauma-informed care and evidence-based practices into its approach.in addition to various counseling services, the organization offers equine-assisted psychotherapy to support reunification efforts and ease children's transitions.campus program: the ranch program provides care and treatment for the emotional and physical needs of approximately 81 children, including sibling groups who have experienced trauma due to physical or emotional abuse and neglect. Texas girls & boys ranch is licensed to serve 45 children, from ages 3 to adult, primarily from within a 150-mile radius. Children reside in a home-like environment, living in one of four cottages with live-in-house parents.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 70.4%; rating input score 70
- Program expense ratio: 82.3%; rating input score 82
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.78 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.5%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 4.4%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.4% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 70.4% of revenue deployed · 82.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $122K · 22 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $178K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.