Texas District Court Alliance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 752818957
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2019
- Location
- Georgetown, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5129431212
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Service Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $61,545
- Expenses
- $60,052
- Assets
- $99,482
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Lisa David (President)
- Joshua Tackett (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Lisa David (President)
- Joshua Tackett (Vice President)
- Tammy Kneuper (Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Educational Purpose
What it reported doing in 2025
Program Service Provided. The District Court Alliance is a coalition of district court representatives that provides educational services to its members and participates in the legislative, judicial, and executive processes of state and federal government. The educational service program is the heart of the Texas District Court Alliance. It is the means which the members develop skills and achieve their goals of becoming well trained, educated clerks. Annually in the month of October, a Texas educational Workshop is conducted by the Board of Directors. The Board allocates an estimated 75% of their time to ensuring the workshop provides quality education. The Workshop is funded, in its vast majority, with grant funds provided by Court of Criminal Appeals via their Judicial & Court Personnel Training Program with Grant Project Title Fund 540. The Workshop includes differing curriculum presented each year. For the year 2025, the education that was presented was in reference to Civil (Non-Family) and Delinquent Tax Suits. We had quality speakers with backgrounds as experts in their assigned topics to ensure accurate information and exceptional training. At end of workshop, Flash Drives are provided to each participant as part of the workshop material. Additionally, we provide and maintain annually a library of current forms to be used by the membership as District Court personnel. The strong educational nature of this program provides for a great means in furthering our exempt purpose. It is well known in the clerk community that the Texas District Court Alliance is a workshop to attend for the quality of education received. Program Service Accomplishments. The Alliance continues to strive to provide excellent education to its membership. The workshop this year 2025 had 256 attendees that went away with the education that was presented in Civil (Non-Family) and Delinquent Tax Suits. Because of the quality we provide within our program service, the annual workshops sponsored by the Alliance have consistently received ratings from attendees in excess of 4.6 out of the possible maximum of 5. The Texas District Court Alliance is based on a 4-year curriculum - Family, Civil (Non-Family), Criminal, and Administration. Each year the Board seeks out qualified speakers based on the session that they will be speaking about, and we want to ensure that handouts can be used when the clerks return to their home county. The flash drive provided is a tool that is used often to assist the clerks with forms, personnel policies, the codes of civil, family and criminal. As well as the Local Government Codes. The Texas District Court Alliance has been approved by the Court of Criminal Appeals based on the education that is provided. The Justice assigned is responsible for the grant and oversees the education and the criteria that must be met to be awarded the grant. Given that 2026 is an election year, the 2026 workshop will focus on Administration.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 87
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.4%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 88.5%; rating input score 89
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.4%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.66; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.4% of revenue deployed · 88.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $53K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.