Texas Diaper Bank
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742886380
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- San Antonio, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2107616345
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $8,161,145
- Expenses
- $8,968,753
- Assets
- $8,201,521
- Liabilities
- $1,958,183
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JORGE MEDINA (CEO)
- TRAVIS MROSS (President)
- ESMERALDA MELA PEREZ (Vice President)
Highest reported compensation
- JORGE MEDINA (CEO): $204,505 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The corporations mission is to address basic and essential needs that encompass the diaper and incontinence gap, period poverty, and disaster relief and recovery. The organization delivers these services through direct programs and community partnerships to strengthen community resilience, improve health outcomes, and remove barriers to daily living for individuals and families in crisis.
What it reported doing in 2025
The corporations mission is to address basic and essential needs and their impact on individuals in crisis. In 2025, the organization implemented a comprehensive service model that integrates direct distribution of essential items with community partnerships and emergency response efforts. This model addresses the diaper and incontinence gap, period poverty, and disaster-related needs while improving health outcomes, strengthening community resilience, and removing barriers to stability.In 2025, the organization served 113,083 people throughout 18 counties in Texas through direct services, partner agency distributions, disaster relief and recovery efforts, referrals, and outreach. This included 6,723 unduplicated clients served through direct services, 2,343 referrals provided, and 99 outreach events conducted to connect individuals and families to essential resources.Direct Services- Parenting Essentials (Diapering Assistance): Provides diapers for children ages 036 months to reduce financial strain on families and support workforce participation and early childhood stability. In 2025, the program recorded 12,792 verified distributions and served 2,464 unduplicated clients.- Flo With Dignity (Menstrual Health Assistance): Addresses period poverty by providing a years supply of menstrual products to low-income individuals, ensuring consistent access to basic hygiene and reducing health risks. In 2025, the program recorded 8,529 verified distributions and served 1,775 unduplicated clients.- Senior Care Essentials (Incontinence Assistance): Provides incontinence supplies to seniors aged 60 and older to protect dignity, prevent health complications, and allow individuals to maintain independence. In 2025, the program recorded 5,331 verified distributions and served 459 unduplicated clients.Indirect Services- Essential Collaborative Partners (ECP): Extends the organizations impact through a network of partner agencies that integrate essential items into services addressing social determinants of health. This model allows essential needs to be met within systems already serving families. In 2025, the program reached 88,262 clients and distributed approximately 2.8 million products.- Disaster Relief and Recovery: Provides essential items and coordinated support to individuals and families affected by emergencies, ensuring rapid response and long-term recovery assistance. In 2025, the program facilitated 18,098 distributions to impact individuals across multiple populations.- Volunteer Program: Engages community members in the repackaging, sorting, and distribution of essential items, strengthening community participation and support for essential needs distribution. In 2025, 3,105 volunteers contributed 11,276 hours, representing $377,633 in donated labor.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 92% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 97
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 96.1%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: $74.88 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -9.9%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.24; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.3%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 11.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 14.7% per year; rating input score 100; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 96.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $8.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $205K · 7 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 31/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 32/100.