Texas Council Painting and Decorating
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 237193291
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2012
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2012
- Location
- Dallas, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2144212584
- Rating
- 36
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Chambers of Commerce & Business Leagues
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,655
- Expenses
- $12,049
- Assets
- $49,216
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the Texas Council of the Painting and Decorating contractors of America is to enhance the level of the professionalism of the painting contractor in the State of Texas to the highest level of credibility.
What it reported doing in 2012
PDCA is committed to education and training, and great emphasis is placed on understanding the importance of how to use each Industry Standard. PDCA encourages the use of PDCA Industry Standards in all contractor work. By implementing Industry Standards, both in contracts and in practical application, a clear differentiation is created between a professional contractor and all others. Using these Industry Standards serves the interests of consumer and contractors alike.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 3
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 3.3%; rating input score 3
- Program expense ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 3
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -13.1%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.08; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 3.3% of revenue deployed · 2.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $352 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $6K · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 3/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.