Texas Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
264012273
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2011, Form 990-N 2009
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Phone
5122931338
Rating
74
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Children's, Youth Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$952,320
Expenses
$820,314
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MOLLY CLAYTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MOLLY CLAYTON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $64,947 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Texas campaign to prevent teen pregnancy is a state-wide, nonpartisan, 501c3 nonprofit organization dedicated to reducing teen pregnancy through research, advocacy, collaboration and training. Our vision is that every Texas teen has access to the information and resources needed to prevent unintended pregnancy.

What it reported doing in 2022

Training events - the Texas campaign manages multiple training events which provide professional development and networking opportunities for youth-serving adults, including healthcare professionals, educators, researchers, social workers, students, and others. The 11th annual statewide symposium was hosted in april 2022 in partnership with healthy futures of Texas. Offered in a hybrid format, there were 302 total registrants, with 214 attending in person and 76 attending virtually. The program was packed with innovative and interactive sessions and consisted of 48 speakers resulting in 4 plenary sessions, 21 breakout sessions, two workshops, two contraceptive training sessions for clinicians, and a contraceptive counseling lunch. In addition, we hosted 16 exhibitors and 10 sponsors. We provided ces to 67 attendees, with community health worker, social worker, and nursing being the top three requested ces. We also provided 46 certificates of attendance.the 6th annual south Texas adolescent health summit was held summer 2023 in partnership with the Texas department of state health services. This event hosted 123 professionals from the rio grande valley including social workers, healthcare providers, researchers, practitioners, educators, youth service professionals, and other key program staff who have a special interest in improving the health of adolescents along the Texas mexico border. Since its inception, more than 650 south Texas youth-serving professionals have received access to content targeted toward their communities, enabling them to better serve those in their regions.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 54
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 54%; rating input score 54
  • Program expense ratio: 62.6%; rating input score 63
  • Fundraising efficiency: $7.65 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.9%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.9%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 15.7% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.7% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 54% of revenue deployed · 62.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $514K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $65K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 10 filing years from 2012 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 28/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 44/100.