Texas Bowling Centers Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 741396721
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Pflugerville, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5127502083
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $313,753
- Expenses
- $276,045
- Assets
- $447,250
- Liabilities
- $29,478
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT HOLMES (PRESIDENT)
- LARRY HIMES (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MIKE LOGAN (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- KAREN MILLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- KAREN MILLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $93,758 total reported compensation
- MIKE SPRIDCO (DIRECTOR AT LARGE): $7,500 total reported compensation
- STEFAN COX (DIRECTOR AT LARGE): $5,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of Texas bca is to enhance the profitability of our members.
What it reported doing in 2025
Convention - trade convention for association members and the bowling industry that provides a meeting place to discuss new plans and innovations in the industry.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 83% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 69
- Sustainability: 48
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 12%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.62; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.07; rating input score 25; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 38.5%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -5.6% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -0.4% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $94K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 25/100.