Texas Bipartisan Alliance

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
873451514
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2021–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Colleyville, TX, USA
Phone
8179683208
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$855
Expenses
$2,250
Assets
$1,367
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Andrew Sternke (President)

People named in this filing

  • Rachel Wall (V.P & Secretary)
  • Kay Allen (Director)
  • Andrew Sternke (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The primary purpose of Texas Bipartisan Alliance (TBA) is to involve volunteers in the local community to engage and educate voters on important issues impacting the governance of local cities and school boards in and around the city of Colleyville. The majority of monetary and/or in-kind service contributions will be used to provide voters at no cost: (1) independent political research/information; (2) communications to advance the education of voters about candidates for public office; (3) assist in voter registration; and (4) promote the advancement of local discussions, debates and deliberations on public policy and bond initiatives.

What it reported doing in 2025

TBA in its second year of operation (2022) spent $4044 on direct activity expenses to conduct a public education book fair fund drive and host a non-endorsement "meet and greet" voter education event to apprise voters on issues impacting the 2022 local school board elections. The impact of operating this 501(c)4 made it possible for TBA to fulfill its social welfare objectives by providing non-endorsement voter information for up to 50K registered voters in the city of Colleyville and the surrounding communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 100
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -163.2%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -30.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -46.3% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2021 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.