Texas Association of Staffing

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
742209554
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
Location
Austin, TX, USA
Phone
0000000000
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Professional Societies, Associations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$167,321
Expenses
$145,796
Assets
$132,658
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

34 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Teresa Crayon (Executive Director)
  • Daniel Gibbs (President- Elect)
  • Dan Howard (President)
  • Chanel Cantu (Past - President)

People named in this filing

  • Teresa Crayon (Executive Director)
  • Daniel Gibbs (President- Elect)
  • Dan Howard (President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Impact through legislative advocacy professional development and ethical standards and industry collaboration regulatory compliance ethical standards industry collaboration tas upholds integrity by encouraging ethical business practices and collaboration among competitors we provide a forum for sharing best practices and fostering innovation in staffing services

What it reported doing in 2025

0

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 12.9%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.91; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.3% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -1.1% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 34 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.