Texas Association of School Boards (TASB)
Legal name: Texas Association of School Boards Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742275519
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2024
- Location
- Austin, TX, US
- Phone
- 800-580-8272
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $103,783,272
- Expenses
- $96,752,558
- Assets
- $115,491,868
- Liabilities
- $18,972,447
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
68 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROLANDA SCHMIDT (PRESIDENT)
- TONY HOPKINS (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
- ARMANDO RODRIGUEZ (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- MARY JANE HETRICK (FIRST VICE PRESIDENT)
- DAN MICCICHE (SECOND VICE PRESIDENT)
- DEBBIE GILLESPIE IMMEDIATE (PAST PRESIDENT (THRU 9/24))
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM MASTRODICASA (FIRST PUBLIC MANAGING DIRECTOR): $698,786 total reported compensation
- DAN TROXELL PHD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $517,408 total reported compensation
- SEDORA JEFFERSON CHIEF CORP (COUNSEL TO 2/25, THEN PT ADVISOR): $430,486 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Colleges are leaders in preparing Texans for the future. It's our mission to help.
What it reported doing in 2024
I. Board development services supports the effectiveness of Texas public school governance teams through training, consulting, facilitation, publications, leadership development programs, and governance resources designed specifically for local school boards and superintendents. Services include in-district board development and governance consulting, team-building and board operating procedure workshops, superintendent evaluation support, board self-assessments, strategic governance planning, leadership succession support, board officer development, leadership tasb, Texas trustee institute, board officer institute, eiso training, regional workshops, conferences, webinars, and the tasb online learning center. These programs are designed to strengthen local governance capacity, improve board-superintendent teamwork, support compliance with state-required trustee training, and promote effective stewardship of public resources on behalf of Texas students and communities, thereby lessening the burdens of government. During fiscal year 2024-25, the array of services provided by board development services reached thousands of trustees, superintendents, and educational leaders throughout the state.ii. First public, llc (first public) - directly and through a service agreement with lone star investment pool, a public funds investment pool established in accordance with the Texas interlocal cooperation act and the Texas public funds investment act, first public provides investment services to local governments, such as school districts, cities, and counties, as well as other governmental entities. First public assists these entities in managing and offering investment programs. First public services help governmental entities reduce the time and expense of managing their investments, and provide for investment diversification. These services enable governmental entities to operate more efficiently and effectively, thereby lessening the burdens of government. During the 2024-25 fiscal year, there were over 700 participating local governments in the lone star investment pool.through a service agreement, first public also provides overall management and program administration to the tasb benefits cooperative (benefits cooperative). The benefits cooperative is an administrative agency of cooperating local governmental entities organized under the Texas interlocal cooperation act. The benefits cooperative was created in an effort to assist Texas school districts with attracting and retaining good employees by providing group benefits coverage and administration to district employees and their family members, thereby lessening the burdens of government. First public's program administration activities include, but are not limited to, procurement assistance in the selection of providers, marketing, participant enrollment, and implementation of benefits cooperative initiatives. There were 31 participating Texas school districts in the benefits cooperative during fiscal year 2024-25. (see part iv line 33 statement in schedule o.)iii. Facility services provides its participants with assistance on environmental regulatory compliance issues, access to professional training, and access to fee-based services such as asbestos sampling, integrated pest management, indoor air quality, asbestos management planning, facility assessments, long-range planning assistance, and construction consulting. Facility services also has a data sharing and license agreement with an outside provider to allow the provider to use the tasb facility dashboard. Additionally, tasb has a wireless infrastructure program agreement with an outside firm to promote a program through which the outside firm, as exclusive provider for the program, works with participating school districts and other governmental entities to offer their property for cellular tower and antenna leases.facility services also has an agreement with an outside provider of expanded environmental services thro
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 80% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 63
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.1%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 88.3%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 54%; rating input score 54; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.8%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.19; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5.2% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 83.1% of revenue deployed · 88.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 42 of 42 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $85.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $699K · 68 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.7M reported
- Consistency: 37 of 38 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 24 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 54/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 45/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.