Texas Academic Advising Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 742905697
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Austin, TX, USA
- Phone
- 5124994264
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $168,752
- Expenses
- $134,038
- Assets
- $152,674
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SARAH SANCHEZ (PRESIDENT)
- JENNIFER BROWNING (VICE PRESIDENT-MARKETING)
- CHYANNE BRYANT (VICE PRESIDENT-MEMBERSHIP)
- TREVOR THOMAS (VICE PRESIDENT-PROGRAMS)
- JANA MCCARTHY (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)
- SAM MURDOCK (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
People named in this filing
- SARAH SANCHEZ (PRESIDENT)
- ALICIA SCHULZE (SECRETARY)
- JASON VAALER (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Promote the professional development of academic advisors in higher education of Texas. Offer networking opportunities and encourage members to participate in professional development. Provide counsel and consultation to members and their institutions on advising issues. Support and promote the development and implementation of professional standards of academic advising.
What it reported doing in 2025
Annual conference
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. No material rating questions were generated from the available inputs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.7%; rating input score 63
- Program expense ratio: 79%; rating input score 79
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.6%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.14; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.3% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.7% of revenue deployed · 79% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $106K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.