Texas A&M Lettermens Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 741794259
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- College Station, TX, USA
- Phone
- 9798463024
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Recreational l Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $706,233
- Expenses
- $267,151
- Assets
- $4,978,451
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mark Magee (Vice President)
- Margaret McGraw (President)
People named in this filing
- Deanie Dudley (Treasurer)
- Erika Eriksson (Director)
- Cody Risien (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Texas A&M Lettermens Association seeks to provide a means for former Texas A&M student athletes to gather and support the University's athletic programs. The Association presents the Texas A&M Athletic Hall of Fame and Hall of Honor and maintains the Archives of A&M Athletic History.
What it reported doing in 2025
Former student athlete connection and social activities and support for current student athletes
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 46
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 92
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 30.3%; rating input score 30
- Program expense ratio: 88.1%; rating input score 88
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 62.2%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 18.64; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 88; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 10.4% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 80.2% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 30.3% of revenue deployed · 88.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $204K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 16 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 14 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 30/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.