TeufelHunden Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 833852329
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Mansfield, TX, USA
- Phone
- 8175721111
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Military, Veterans' Organizations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $87,205
- Expenses
- $75,471
- Assets
- $43,022
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Pete Shryock (Director and President)
People named in this filing
- Thomas Mendonca (Director)
- Joaquin Torres (Director)
- Walker Frye (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The TeufelHunden Foundation is a group of United States Marines and Marine Minded individuals working together to improve the lives of Marines, their families, Veterans, first responders and other members of our community, with an emphasis on those directly correlated to the United States Marine Corps. It is our desire to honor the name given to WW1 Marines by the Germans, "TeufelHunden, translated Devil Dogs", by charging into any obstacle that may arise and completing every mission.
What it reported doing in 2024
Collected Christmas toys for HIM Center in Mansfield
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 77
- Accountability: 0
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.2%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 91.5%; rating input score 91
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 80%; rating input score 80; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 89.1%; rating input score 89; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 0 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 13.5%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.57; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 11.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.2% of revenue deployed · 91.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 9 board members independent · 0 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $69K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 14 of 16 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 3 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 6 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.