Teton Valley Food Pantry Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454252391
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019, Form 990-N 2013
- Location
- Driggs, ID, USA
- Phone
- 2083541658
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Food Banks, Pantries
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,031,536
- Expenses
- $861,178
- Assets
- $668,594
- Liabilities
- $11,216
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
People named in this filing
- ANNE FORTIER (BOARD CHAIR)
- TIM FOREMAN (VICE CHAIR)
- DIANE TEMPLE (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide nutritious supplemental food to the teton valley community. We want every person who lives with food insecurity to have healthy food available.
What it reported doing in 2024
Our mission statement embodies who we are for teton valley. Not only do we offer supplemental food for those in need, but we also collaborate with many other nonprofits offering healthy snacks for their program participants, as they are experiencing difficulty in supplying snacks. Our personal shopping model offers our neighbors the opportunity to choose the foods they want, instead of just offering a box with items they may or may not like. This offers dignity to our neighbors and provides a fulfilled purpose for our volunteers where they know they are making a big difference in someone's life. Feeding america is our partner in the rescued foods that we get from our local grocery stores. This gives an additional 5000-6000 pounds on average per month to our community. There are no qualifications to receive this food. We see many families coming in multiple times a week to get the rescued foods. We serve over 241 households per week for their supplemental food from the pantry. Many businesses, churches and individuals host a monthly or yearly food drive to offset the costs for us. Weekly we purchase a meat protein, eggs, milk, fresh fruits and vegetable, in addition to healthy snacks for our school children. We have a strong recurring monthly financial donor base. We encourage restaurants and people to donate from their home pantries to offset our costs. Many local farmers grow specifically for the pantry to provide fresh vegetables and fruit throughout the summer. At the end of the weekly farmers market, we visit specific booths that donate their extra produce.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 61
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 77.8%; rating input score 78
- Program expense ratio: 92.6%; rating input score 93
- Fundraising efficiency: $91.18 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 16.5%; rating input score 72; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 40.3% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 28.8% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 27.7% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 77.8% of revenue deployed · 92.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $798K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.