Terry Roping Club Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
260385571
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Terry, MT, USA
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Equestrian

Reported finances

Revenue
$82,653
Expenses
$88,522
Assets
$24,122

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Joseph Lewis (President)
  • Tate Pehl (Vide President)

People named in this filing

  • Joseph Lewis (President)
  • Tate Pehl (Vide President)
  • Sara Pehl (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide local opportunities for your and adult rodeo events in Prairie County MT.

What it reported doing in 2025

PART III LINE 31 - OTHER PROGRAM SERVICES: In addition to its primary rodeo events Terry Roping Club Inc. conducts several additional program service activities throughout the year including the Terry Yippee Roping Scramble Night Roping and Ranch Rodeo Finals. These events provide continued opportunities for community members including youth and adult participants to develop rodeo and roping skills in a structured and supportive environment. They promote sportsmanship horsemanship and the preservation of traditional western heritage. Participation fees collected for these events are used to support event operations and are redistributed as participant payouts consistent with standard rodeo practices. These activities are integral to the organizations exempt purpose and contribute to ongoing community engagement and program continuity throughout the year. These are not considered grants but additional program service accomplishments.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.8%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 79.2%; rating input score 79

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.1%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.27; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.8% of revenue deployed · 79.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $70K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.