Terry Homes Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 522284384
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Timonium, MD, USA
- Phone
- 4107474492
- Rating
- 93
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Low-Income & Subsidized Rental Housing
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $69,990
- Expenses
- $103,555
- Assets
- $343,387
- Liabilities
- $119,938
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DIANE MAISTROS (PRESIDENT)
- RICHARD BARR (VICE-PRESIDENT)
- ERINN SHAW (VICE-PRESIDENT THRU 11/24/24)
People named in this filing
- DIANE MAISTROS (PRESIDENT)
- KELLY SAVOCA (SVP & CFO)
- SARAH NORMAN (CHIEF, COMMUNITY DEV. THRU 8/18/24)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide affordable housing to the chronically mentally disabled under section 811 of the national affordable housing act.
What it reported doing in 2024
Terry homes, inc. Was organized in november 2000 under the provisions of the state of Maryland for the purpose of acquiring and constructing housing and related facilities for persons who suffer from chronic mental illness. The entity was financed through the u.s. Department of housing and urban development ("hud") under section 811 of the national affordable housing act and consists of 9 units. Such projects are regulated by hud as to rent charges and operating methods.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 83.5%; rating input score 84
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -48%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.32; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -2.7% per year; rating input score 0; 30th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 83.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $87K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 11 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 13/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.