Terra Equine Therapy Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 920536782
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Center Conway, NH, USA
- Phone
- 6034876745
- Rating
- 90
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Mental Health Treatment F31 Psychiatric, Mental Health Hospital
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $170,738
- Expenses
- $174,999
- Assets
- $4,315
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Bethany Darling (Executive Director/ President)
- Dale Drew (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Donald Olsen (Clinical Director)
- Bethany Darling (Executive Director/ President)
- Olivia Caron (Equine Manager/Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary exempt purpose of TERRA Equine Therapy Center is to provide high-quality equine-assisted services to the people of our community through the pillars of our mission: Therapy, Education, Rescue, Research and Advocacy.
What it reported doing in 2024
YOUTH HORSEMANSHIP AND LIFE SKILLS PROGRAM: After-School and Summer program started in Sep 2023 and discontinued in Nov 2024 due to client request for alternative services. Provided horsemanship, life skills, resiliency, and team building education for youth aged 8-18 five days per week, 2 hours/day after school or 3 hours/day during the summer, 46 weeks of the year. Served an average of 8 students per week for total of 851 direct client-hours in 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 99% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 91
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -2.5%; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 23.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 68.4% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 57.1% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -66.1% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $157K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.