Terebinth Refuge

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813807059
IRS 990 coverage
2017–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Waite Park, MN, USA
Phone
3208287721
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Rape Victim Services
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$928,896
Expenses
$1,105,279
Assets
$290,476
Liabilities
$50,210

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CYNTHIA TERLOUW-KVISTAD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (END 11/18/25))
  • EDWARD STRACKE (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (BEG 11/18/25)/)

Highest reported compensation

  • CYNTHIA TERLOUW-KVISTAD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (END 11/18/25)): $58,053 total reported compensation
  • EDWARD STRACKE (INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (BEG 11/18/25)/): $31,700 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

A christ-centered nonprofit shelter and safe home that brings hope, healing services, and freedom to sexually exploited and trafficked women. We provide long-term holistic services with the goal of transitioning the women from bondage to a life of health, stability, and independence.

What it reported doing in 2025

Transitional - the transitional program is the fourth phase of programming. This is an opportunity for the women to live in a separate home with more independence, but still work with some staff and case management support. In this home, women are either working in the community or attending school, saving, and planning for full independence which is their next step. 5 women have left terebinth refuge into stable housing and employment during 2025. During 2025, we witnessed an increase in length of stay at terebinth refuge and had 4 women move into the transitional program. Prior to this, there had been a "dry" spell at the transition house, with no occupants between 2022-2023 and 1 in 2024. There are women who choose to graduate from shelter and move into independence without transitional programming. Transition gives the women a chance to practice and save money, increasing success and stability. We attribute some of this year's success to our in-house therapist, who had the opportunity to increase her skills and train the advocates in working with higher levels of trauma such as familial trafficking. All the survivors have benefited from these skills learned. We took in fewer women this year due to financial concerns and limited our number of intakes in the fall.aftercare/outreach: the purpose of the aftercare program is to provide collaborative support and programming to past residents of the organization and assist them toward sustainable independence. This is accomplished through mentorship, coaching, advocacy, and education. Aftercare seeks to build on the past resident's strengths and skills turning survivors into survivor leaders. Aftercare is a survivor led program and is assisted by the organization's staff and case management. 5 residents received aftercare services upon exiting the shelter program. 16 regularly participated in aftercare programming with an average stability score of 7.73 out of 9.0.the outreach program is to connect with organizations, collaborative partners, and community members to offer education and resources for victims of sex trafficking and or sexual exploitation, along with increasing community awareness of the issue. Presentations, classes and intentional relationship building are some of the ways this will be accomplished.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 94% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 15
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 83%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 69.3%; rating input score 69
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -19%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.26; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.17; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 8.1%; rating input score 43; 43rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 8.2% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 10.8% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 83% of revenue deployed · 69.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $766K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $58K · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2017 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 8 not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 43/100.