Tennis Association of Hilton Head Island

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
570736905
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Hilton Head, SC, USA
Phone
7705966291
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$135,267
Expenses
$57,130
Assets
$315,900
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACKIE REYNECKE (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JACKIE REYNECKE (PRESIDENT)
  • TRACY CASTRICONE (TREASUREER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The association shall promote the development of tennis as a means of healthful recreation and physical fitness in the greater hilton head island community; shall cooperate with the united states tennis association and other associations in the pursuit of these aims; shall generally encourage, through tennis, the development of health, character and responsible citizenship; shall encourage broad-based community participation by subsidizing lesson fees and establishing scholarship programs for applicants unable to meet costs; and shall foster local tournaments and competitions where the board deems necessary.

What it reported doing in 2024

Grants awarded to support area public tennis tournaments. Over 4,000 individuals benefited directly and supported development of area facilities. Published directory of local area tennis players.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 73% for direct work, and 27% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 89
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 41.3%; rating input score 41
  • Program expense ratio: 97.8%; rating input score 98

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 57.8%; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.53; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 22.8% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 41.3% of revenue deployed · 97.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $56K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 41/100.