Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942761808
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
(415) 474-8888
Rating
81
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Low-Income & Subsidized Rental Housing

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,950,134
Expenses
$30,817,151
Assets
$114,333,645
Liabilities
$33,739,795

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

24 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • SUSAN JOHNSON (PRESIDENT)
  • FERNANDO PUJALS (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KATHERINE LAMOUNT (COO AND INTERIM CO-CEO)
  • ROXANNE HUEY (CFO AND INTERIM CO-CEO)
  • MAURILIO LEON (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • ROXANNE HUEY (CFO AND INTERIM CO-CEO): $313,488 total reported compensation
  • KATHERINE LAMOUNT (COO AND INTERIM CO-CEO): $304,472 total reported compensation
  • AMORY SHARPE (CFDS OFFICER): $201,667 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of TNDC is to develop community and provide affordable housing and services for people with low incomes in the Tenderloin and throughout San Francisco to promote equitable access to opportunity and resources.

What it reported doing in 2024

Community organizing department (co): in 2024, the tenderloin community witnessed significant accomplishments in community organizing and development. The tenderloin food policy council celebrated its first full year of effective community organizing and advocacy with big wins for the community, such as the restoration of the market match program funds in the state budget and expansion of food vouchers for the families of the tenderloin. They received a certificate of honor from the san francisco board of supervisors for their service to the community. They held regular monthly meeting with a membership of approximately 100 tenderloin residents with simultaneous translation in english, chinese, arabic and spanish. 6 resident leaders of the food policy council members also attended a national training conference where they learned leadership skills in organizing, meeting facilitation and advocacy. They developed a platform agenda and developed advocacy action plans for campaigns in 2025.2024 also saw the creation of the supportive housing overdose prevention network, a resident advocacy group with special focus on addressing overdoses in supportive housing, especially high impacted single room occupancies (sros). They identified resident leaders to co-facilitate the group with staff and began working on identifying policy or program recommendations developed from those that are the most impacted by overdoses. They will work through 2025 on creating the advocacy platform and strategies. We worked with other departments to pilot the installation and supply of narcan in a few of our sro buildings and developed, in partnership with property management and tenant services, a plan for managing and monitoring the pilot in 2024.the tenderloin chines rights association celebrated its 14th year with another group of chinese seniors completing a leadership training program and assuming leadership roles in the chinese community. With nearly 400 resident members, tcra is the largest resident-based neighborhood advocacy group in the tenderloin.in 2024, we also saw the completion of the draft tenderloin community action plan (tcap), a community-developed plan facilitated in part by tndc community organizing staff who served as the community engagement coordinator for tcap. Our staff hosted and facilitated dozens of community meetings, resident working groups, focus groups and the community tcap partner meetings. We also hosted a large community town hall to share the draft plan back to the community and develop support. Hundreds of residents and community stakeholders were engaged as through this unique neighborhood planning process with the city planning department. The tcap will be officially voted on by the sf board of supervisors for approval in early 2025.a new leadership academy curriculum and plan was created and funding identified that will be used to conduct multiple leadership academy resident cohorts in 2025.the community organizing department engaged with the sf department of elections in doing voter outreach, education, voter registration, poll worker registration, and get out the vote efforts which included events such as the "walk with windy" get out the vote event that brings many dozens of tenderloin residents together to conduct a march to city hall to deliver completed their ballots or to vote in person.further community and administrative support was given by the organizing team for resident-led groups such as the tenderloin people's congress and the tenderloin filipino community association, engaging over 200 residents in community advocacy and providing leadership development and capacity building support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 65% for direct work, and 35% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 68
  • Transparency & Controls: 88
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.8%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 77.2%; rating input score 77
  • Fundraising efficiency: $20.71 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 16.6%; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.71; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.3; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 6.2%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 64.8% of revenue deployed · 77.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $23.8M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $313K · 24 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.1M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 74 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 41/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.