Ten Sixteen Recovery Network
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 382278390
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Midland, MI, USA
- Phone
- 9896310241
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,209,334
- Expenses
- $5,533,288
- Assets
- $5,235,606
- Liabilities
- $2,559,583
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Samuel Price (President/CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Samuel Price (President/CEO): $146,508 total reported compensation
- Laurie Keyser (CFO): $115,721 total reported compensation
- Holli Carter (Chief Program Officer): $98,827 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Ten Sixteen Recovery Network has a proud history of providing services to people who's lives are impacted by alcohol and drugs. Ten Sixteen promotes recovery and wellness at every stage of substance misuse using shared experience, proven steps, and supportive accountability.
What it reported doing in 2025
Community Based Treatment Programs: We have 5 Centers for Recovery and Wellness, serving 6 counties that offer drop in services, treatment for clients dealing with addictions (primarily related to substance use disorder) and multiple educational and community programs. We offer a full range of services from Prevention to Outpatient therapeutic interventions and recovery support services, including both individual and group settings, designed to meet a client's intensity of need and desire to change. Total hours of treatment and coaching provided by our clinicians and recovery coaches in our Outpatient settings were 22,383 in 2025 which was a slight increase from 21,735 in 2024. The number of clients served in 2025 and 2024 was 760 and 860, respectively. In our Collegiate Recovery programs we provide screening, education and recovery support services to students on 4 college campuses. Programming services were provided to 628 students in 2025 down from 759 students in 2024. In addition, 213 presentations and social events were conducted to a total of 18,438 attendees in 2025 as compared to 71 events provided to a total of 740 attendees in 2024. The Prevention Program serves students in multiple elementary through high schools in 7 counties in our region. In 2025, prevention curriculum services were provided to 730 classrooms in schools as compared to 717 in 2024.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 72% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 84
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 96
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.7%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 89.3%; rating input score 89
- Fundraising efficiency: $142.33 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 10.9%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.95; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.49; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.5%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.7% of revenue deployed · 89.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 14 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $4.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $147K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 45 of 46 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.