Tempo of Madison Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391374610
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Madison, WI, USA
Phone
6082865889
Rating
37
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$105,547
Expenses
$115,818
Assets
$203,188
Liabilities
$35,620

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MEGAN PURTELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (BEG JULY))
  • ANNE SAPPENFIELD (PRESIDENT)
  • JENNIFER WINDING (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • SUSAN THOMSON (PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • MEGAN PURTELL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (BEG JULY))
  • ERIN FABRIZIUS (EXECUTIVE ADMINISTRATOR (THRU JULY))
  • ANNE SAPPENFIELD (PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To lead, engage, and connect influential women of diverse backgrounds and experience to help them succeed at the highest professional levels in our community.

What it reported doing in 2024

Tempo of madison's membership is comprised of approximately 250 women in executive and leadership positions throughout the madison area community. The organization held monthly luncheons for its members. A speaker was invited to each luncheon. The luncheons and other networking opportunities allow women executives the opportunity to meet and share common interests.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 33
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0.1%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.7%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.75; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.18; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 47.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -8.8% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0.1% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.