Temple University Hospital Auxiliary

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
236390560
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2013
Forms available
Form 990 2013
Location
Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phone
2157074698
Rating
57
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Single Organization Support

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$232,505
Expenses
$42,851
Assets
$422,790
Liabilities
$6,989

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • McNamara Mary (President)
  • Guy Libby (President-Elect)
  • Derricotte Loretta (First Vice President)
  • Giagnacova Luci (Immediate Past President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Croston Gwendolyn (Treasurer): $92,277 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See Schedule OThe mission of the Auxiliary is to support Temple University Hospital, Inc. Its Auxiliary Members partner with Hospital administrators, serve as volunteers to enhance the quality of life for patients, promote health and wellness programs throughout the Community and sponsor fundraisers to fund programs/projects in the Hospital.

What it reported doing in 2013

See Schedule OThe Auxiliary partners with hospital and health care administration tofund many projects and different programs throughout the hospital andhealth care system. Some of the projects that the Auxiliary has beenproud to be a part of are the expansion of the Ambulatory Care Center, renovations to the Temple University Hospital Cafeteria, creation of the reference library at the new Medical School, equipment purchases for the Hybrid Operating Room and the Burn Center and Community Health Worker funding to improve the lives of community members, patient and family members. In addition to providing financial support, the Auxiliary provides support to hospital administration by partnering on hospital wide programs.Our next function within the hospital is fundraising. We have severaldifferent fundraising activities at any time throughout the year. Inaddition to periodic events, the main fundraiser is the Acres of Diamonds Gala. This premiere event is our largest fundraiser.Last, but certainly not least, is the volunteering efforts in the hospital. Following in the path of our Founder, Dr. Russell H. Conwell, the members of the Hospital Services Committee give freely of their time, talent and experience to make the patient's visit more comfortable. Our Auxilians provide service on the Surgery and Intensive Care floor by offering compassion and friendship to patients, families, and friends at a much needed time. Volunteers make rounds providing coffee, tea and magazines for waiting family members and loved ones.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 69% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 46% for direct work, and 54% for grants.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 34
  • Transparency & Controls: 78
  • Accountability: 66
  • Sustainability: 82
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 11.6%; rating input score 12
  • Program expense ratio: 63.3%; rating input score 63
  • Fundraising efficiency: $19.06 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 51%; rating input score 51; 38th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 81.6%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 9.87; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.3%; rating input score 31; 31st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 11.6% of revenue deployed · 63.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $27K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $92K · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 51/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 31/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.