Temple Ministries Cfc Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 460529617
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Selden, NY, USA
- Phone
- 6316984273
- Rating
- 37
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $409,744
- Expenses
- $211,981
- Assets
- $474,745
- Liabilities
- $120,406
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM NIEVES (President/Trust)
People named in this filing
- WILLIAM NIEVES (President/Trust)
- EUGENIA NIEVES (Secretary/TRUST)
- LORRAINE SALIMANDO (Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To organize, form, establish and operate a non-denominated church; to encourage and promote bible and other religious works and teachings; perform and conduct prayer and worship services; to teach; practice of religous rituals and ceremonies. To foster, advance and promote the practice of the religious beliefs of the church; to organize and conduct religious discussions among the members and with other individuals and religious groups; to increase, foster and advance the understanding of religious principles and ideals among others belonging to different faiths; to create and establish programs to further such principles and ideals; to stimulate interest in and foster the religious development of people seeking such instruction; to endeavor to inculcate and maintain high moral and ethical standards in charitable activities and services benefit the community; to foster a spirit of friendship and benevolence among all people and generally to advance the welfare of the congregation member
What it reported doing in 2024
To organize, form, establish and operate a non-denominated church; to encourage and promote bible and other religious works and teachings; perform and conduct prayer and worship services; to teach; practice of religous rituals and ceremonies. To foster, advance and promote the practice of the religious beliefs of the church; to organize and conduct religious discussions among the members and with other individuals and religious groups; to increase, foster and advance the understanding of religious principles and ideals among others belonging to different faiths; to create and establish programs to further such principles and ideals; to stimulate interest in and foster the religious development of people seeking such instruction; to endeavor to inculcate and maintain high moral and ethical standards in charitable activities and services benefit the community; to foster a spirit of friendship and benevolence among all people and generally to advance the welfare of the congregation members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 76% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 12
- Transparency & Controls: 81
- Accountability: 6
- Sustainability: 71
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 10%; rating input score 10
- Program expense ratio: 19.3%; rating input score 19
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 78.4%; rating input score 78; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 48.3%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.24; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 10% of revenue deployed · 19.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 3 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $41K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 22 of 23 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 10/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 19/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 17/100.