Temple Health System Transport Team Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 753084023
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Phone
- 2157076686
- Rating
- 55
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Ambulance, Emergency Medical Transport Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,519,723
- Expenses
- $6,774,483
- Assets
- $3,751,056
- Liabilities
- $1,105,389
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Daniel del Portal MD (President)
Highest reported compensation
- Michael Young (Director): $2,136,271 total reported compensation
- Amy Goldberg MD (Director (Until 11/5/24)): $1,215,526 total reported compensation
- Gerald Oetzel (Treasurer): $951,697 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Temple Transport Team serves as one component of TUHS's integrated health care delivery system. The mission of Temple Transport Team is to provide a flexible and all encompassing transport program coordinated via the comprehensive communications center (dispatch and transfer center services).
What it reported doing in 2024
The Temple Transport Team Comprehensive Communications Center was launched in February 2011 combining the functions of both T3 dispatch and Temple University Hospital Transfer Center into a unified command center. The Communications Center provides both inbound and outbound services to the affiliates. The focus of the Communications Center is to facilitate the timely communication between community physicians and Temple physicians leading to the transfer/transport of high acuity patients.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Affiliate-supported. 65% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and a relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 59
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 32
- Sustainability: 58
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 54.8%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 84.9%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 35.6%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.55; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6.1%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.9% per year; rating input score 100; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 54.8% of revenue deployed · 84.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $5.8M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.1M · 10 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $6.1M reported
- Consistency: 21 of 21 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 16 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 42/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 47/100.