Temple Health Physicians PC

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
992360361
IRS 990 coverage
2023–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Ewing, NJ, USA
Phone
2157076686
Rating
68
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Management & Technical Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,297,828
Expenses
$1,297,828
Assets
$2,478,714
Liabilities
$2,478,714

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dr Robert Uzzo (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Dr Robert Uzzo (President): $1,582,504 total reported compensation
  • Gerald Oetzel (Asst Treasurer): $951,697 total reported compensation
  • Jerome Maddox (Secretary): $534,746 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See Schedule OThe mission of Temple Health Physicians, P.C. is to provide greater access to high-quality cancer and health care services to communities in New Jersey. Additionally, the organization operates to support the charitable purposes of the 501(c)(3) tax-exempt hospital, The American Oncologic Hospital d/b/a Hospital of The Fox Chase Cancer Center and its 501(c)(3) tax-exempt affiliates.

What it reported doing in 2024

Temple Health Physicians, P.C. provides top-notch healthcare to the communities of South Jersey. Our state-of-the-art facility highlights our commitment to delivering clinical excellence and outstanding patient care. With renowned Hospital of The Fox Chase Cancer Center physician leaders practicing on-site, including the departmental Chairs of Urology and Radiation Oncology, and the Chief of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, patients can expect superior care compared to other local options. In addition to convenience, patients also benefit from access to Fox Chase's nationally recognized research, cutting-edge treatments, and opportunities to join clinical trials, furthering our dedication to improving cancer care. Services offered on site include urology and urologic oncology, as well as consultations for radiation oncology, plastic and reconstructive surgery, and hematology.

Operating model

Revenue model
Affiliate-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 65
  • Accountability: 32
  • Sustainability: 37
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.91; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 24%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 71.4% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 71.4% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 71.7% per year; rating input score 100; 98th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 0 of 1 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.3M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1.6M · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 23 of 23 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 36/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.