Temple Health
Legal name: Temple Faculty Practice Plan Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831002191
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Aug 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Philadelphia, PA, US
- Phone
- 800-836-7536
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $455,635,240
- Expenses
- $453,197,101
- Assets
- $100,798,284
- Liabilities
- $114,279,284
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Claire Raab (President & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- Michael Young (Director): $2,136,271 total reported compensation
- Yoshiya Toyoda (Professor Clinician Scholar): $1,714,221 total reported compensation
- Dr Amy Goldberg (Director): $1,215,526 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Temple Health is dedicated to providing high-quality, compassionate care to the communities we serve, advancing medical knowledge through research, and training the next generation of healthcare leaders.
What it reported doing in 2024
Temple Faculty Practice Plan, Inc. (TFPP) is a network of primary care and specialty academic physicians who are dually employed by TFPP and the Lewis Katz School of Medicine, which is part of Temple University. TFPP offers primary care services as well as specialty services to patients in North and Northeast Philadelphia and surrounding areas, many of which are located in areas designated by the US Department of Health and Human Services as Medically Underserved Areas / Populations for medical care professionals. TFPP employs or otherwise contracts with approximately 700 physicians to provide healthcare services to its patients, including both inpatient and outpatient services of the affiliated hospitals of Temple University Health System (TUHS).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 99% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of voting board members are independent and few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 65
- Accountability: 50
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 89.4%; rating input score 89
- Program expense ratio: 89.8%; rating input score 90
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 15.4%; rating input score 15; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.13; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.4%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 6.9% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.8% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.7% per year; rating input score 100; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 89.4% of revenue deployed · 89.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 13 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $407M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.1M · 25 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $36.4M reported
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 15 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 15 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 15/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 49/100.