Temecula Titans Youth Football and Cheer
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 454206932
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Temecula, CA, USA
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $104,207
- Expenses
- $70,976
- Assets
- $43,213
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JEN READ (President)
- DEBBIE JOHNSON (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- JEN READ (President)
- JACK TALMADGE (Director)
- PARLENE LOPEZ (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of temecula titan youth football & cheer is to enable our children to benefit from participation in the sports of football and cheer in a safe and structured environment. Through this active participation, the program teaches fundamental skills, values and knowledge that these young people will use throughout their lives.its further purpose is to obtain suitable and adequate financial support for the organization and to own, lease, or otherwise provide suitable playing facilities and equipment for these purposes.
What it reported doing in 2013
Temecula Titans Youth Football and Cheer is one of the largest youth football and cheer organizations in Southern California. During the year ended December 31, 2013, Temecula Titans Youth Football and Cheer gave over 175 boys and girls the opportunity to participate in the sports of youth football and cheer and gave two football scholarships.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 63
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 64
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 53.9%; rating input score 54
- Program expense ratio: 79.1%; rating input score 79
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 31.9%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.61; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -28.3% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 16.8% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 53.9% of revenue deployed · 79.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $56K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 54/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.