Tel Hai Retirement Community

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
232039189
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Honey Brook, PA, USA
Phone
6102733149
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$43,874,957
Expenses
$41,842,699
Assets
$123,072,672
Liabilities
$121,761,691

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID SHENK (PRESIDENT/CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • DAVID SHENK (PRESIDENT/CEO): $301,997 total reported compensation
  • SHARON CANULL (ASSISTANT SECRETARY/CFO): $167,743 total reported compensation
  • HEIDI STOLTZFUS (VP OF MISSION ADVANCEMENT): $166,607 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our Mission, Vision, and Core Values Start with You Tel Hai’s Mission.** Motivated by Christ’s love for all, our covenant is to provide a vibrant, caring community that enhances the lives of those served. Tel Hai’s Vision.** To be an innovative Christian community, to inspire respect and purpose for each individual, and to excel in providing quality service. One reason residents choose Tel Hai is so they can live life independent, healthy, and worry-free. Our Personal Care services offer just the right amount of daily support—like help with bathing, dressing, or medication management—so residents can focus on doing what they love while we take care of the rest. Considerate 24-hour nursing support in an inviting personal care environment At Tel Hai’s Lakeview Personal Care, our trained professionals can provide personal support, meals, maintenance, transportation, housekeeping, and...

What it reported doing in 2024

Tel hai retirement community is a faith-based non-profit 501(c) (3) continuing care retirement community located in honey brook, chester county, pa which started in 1956. Our vision is to be an innovative christian community, to inspire respect and purpose for each individual and to excel in providing quality care. Tel hai provides a continuum of services and care for a total of 725 residential living, personal care, memory support care and skilled nursing residents. Comprehensive inpatient and outpatient physical, occupational and speech therapies are available for residents and the greater community. Our goal is to maintain an individual's highest level of independence and provide support to the residents. Residents can enjoy several dining venues, frequent off campus trips, many wellness programs including two pools, gyms, lectures, clubs, trips, and concerts. Various dining venues provide options and chapel services are available to residents. All these programs and amenities offer independence, choice and enhance one's lifestyle. Tel hai has an active volunteer program with a total of 264 volunteers who provided 25,806 hours of various services for the organization. Tel hai also partners with the community to identify services that residents may assist with such as fire company mailings, food bank servers and other community services.as part of the organization's charitable mission, benevolence is extended as needed and when appropriate to residents at all levels of care. The estimated costs of providing benevolent care are based upon the direct and indirect costs identified with the specific benevolent care provided. The cost of benevolent care provided to residents amounted to approximately $3,586,669 in 2025. Tel hai operates 406 independent living units for up to 571 elderly residents providing housing, social service support, social and physical activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 96% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and most voting board members are independent. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and the filing does not identify recipients for some grant dollars.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 74
  • Transparency & Controls: 59
  • Accountability: 91
  • Sustainability: 57
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.9%; rating input score 82
  • Program expense ratio: 85.4%; rating input score 85
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 93.3%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 50%; rating input score 50; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.6%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.94; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.99; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1.3%; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 2.7% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 1 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 81.9% of revenue deployed · 85.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $35.7M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $302K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $6M reported
  • Consistency: 33 of 34 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 50/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 52/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.