Teknique Cares Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
992555890
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
College Park, GA, USA
Phone
9293100605
Rating
66
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Improvement, Capacity Building N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$88,338
Expenses
$76,628
Assets
$11,710
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Tekoa K Hash (Board Chair)
  • Yannize Joshua (Vice Chair)
  • Lauryn McGee (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Teknique Cares Inc. provides charitable, educational, wellness, and workforce development programs designed to empower underserved communities through economic support, professional development, and community-based assistance services.

What it reported doing in 2025

During the tax year, Teknique Cares Inc. carried out its exempt purposes by providing rapid assistance and supportive services to 69 individuals facing financial hardship and barriers to stability. The organization distributed direct assistance awards to help meet urgent community needs, including emergency support and community outreach efforts. Teknique Cares also advanced its mission through workforce development and empowerment initiatives designed to support economic mobility, personal growth, and career readiness. Programs included educational outreach, professional development opportunities, and community engagement activities focused on equipping participants with practical skills and resources. Through its charitable and community-based programs, the organization served and supported individuals within underserved communities by providing financial assistance, outreach services, and opportunities for personal and professional development.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 58.9%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 67.9%; rating input score 68

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.3%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.8%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 58.9% of revenue deployed · 67.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $52K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 10/100.