Tehila Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
922486589
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Housing Expense Reduction Support
Affiliation
Judaism

Reported finances

Revenue
$133,420
Expenses
$100,182
Assets
$118,508
Liabilities
$85,000

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Eliezer Krawiec (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • Eliezer Krawiec (CEO)
  • Avrohom Tress (CFO)
  • Chaim Freeman (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The specific purpose of this corporation is to advance religious purposes by supporting Traditional Orthodox Jewish Schools serving the greater Los Angeles Jewish Community (the Community) in efforts to retain qualified teachers and educators who might otherwise leave the Community because of the lack of affordable housing. This corporation is organized and operated exclusively for the purposes set forth within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(3).

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Liabilities are high compared with assets and the available information about grant readiness state registration leaves an important question unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 75%; rating input score 75
  • Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 24.9%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.18; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.72; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 75% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $100K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 7/100.
  • Review — Grant Readiness: California registration: this organization could not be resolved against the register, so the check is unfinished.