Teenwise Minnesota

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
411722338
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2015–2015
Forms available
Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Eagan, MN, USA
Phone
6516874478
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Birth Defects, Genetic Diseases Research

Reported finances

Revenue
$25,984
Expenses
$101,460
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

People named in this filing

  • ANDREW MARTENS (DIRECTOR/PRE)
  • JENNIFER CLELLAND (DIRECTOR/SEC)
  • HEATHER FARBER-LAU (DIRECTOR/TRE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Teenwise Minnesota promotes the sexual health of young people by strengthening the capacity to implement evidence-based practices, programs and policies.

What it reported doing in 2015

For the period of october 1, 2015 through termination of business on november 30, 2015: sexual health promotion planned and delivered 4 training programs on implementing evidence-based sexuality education. Provided technical assistance to community-based organizations in support of their efforts to select, implement and evaluate science-based approaches to teen pregnancy, HIV and sti prevention. Served as Minnesota's certified replication partner for the teen outreach program, an evidence based youth development and pregnancy prevention program. Provided training and consultation to nearly 35 clubs. Managed the "it's that easy" website. The website acts as the hub for the parent educator network that is being built through this initiative. Served as the fiscal agent for the hennepin county teen parent connection. Policy/advocacy continued serving on steering committee of Minnesota chlamydia partnership; hosted the mcp website. Communications/public awareness provided the latest research, resources, program updates, funding opportunities and legislative issues related to adolescent parents, through a monthly electronic newsletter. Fulfilled one request for radio interview and conducted one community presentation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 60% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 44% for direct work, and 56% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 88
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 2
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 67.2%; rating input score 67

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -290.5%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 76.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -21.5% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -31% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 67.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $68K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.