Teenswhocare Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850786518
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Newcastle, WA, USA
- Phone
- 4252331737
- Rating
- 44
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Voluntarism Promotion
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $15,933
- Expenses
- $25,344
- Assets
- $16,162
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- PRATIMA LAKHOTIA (PRESIDENT)
- SAMEEKSHA DANGI (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- PRATIMA LAKHOTIA (PRESIDENT)
- SAVINAY DANGI (SECRETARY AND TREASURER)
- SAMEEKSHA DANGI (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Create and find curated local volunteer opportunities that are appealing to high school students. Find students to provide non-profits and philanthropic causes with a steady stream of reliable volunteers. Develop easy to use web portal that connects high school students and ready-made volunteering opportunities together and accounts for the availability of both parties and students' skills.
What it reported doing in 2025
Created 2 new opportunities and connected with 6 opportunities for the high school students to volunteer in person or on a virtual basis. This brings the total number of available volunteering opportunities to 10. Registered a total of 3722 volunteers through the Teenswhocare web portal. These volunteers have served a total of 12141 hours. They have impacted the lives of 15K+ people.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 30
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -59.1%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.64; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -64.9% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 28.9% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.