Teens Aloud Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 884056943
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- La Marque, TX, USA
- Phone
- 2814750502
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Christianity
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $67,500
- Expenses
- $57,863
- Assets
- $18,068
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Abena Amankwa (Texas State Love Fellowship President)
People named in this filing
- Buernor Essegbey (Deputy Country Director and Outreach Director)
- Maame Adwoa Ankrah (Country Director)
- Celine Agbotey (National Love Fellowships Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a Non-Denominational Christian Fellowship with the vision to challenge a young generation to believe in their gifted purpose and passionately pursue Jesus Christ to take His life-giving message to the ends of the earth.
What it reported doing in 2025
Boston Campus & Community Outreach (March 2025) Campus Outreach: Teens Aloud Foundation successfully provided mentorship and leadership development to students at Northeastern University in Boston, Massachusetts. Through interactive workshops, motivational talks, and one-on-one mentoring sessions, about 20 student participants gained skills in goal setting, communication, and decision-making, fostering personal growth, self-confidence, and critical leadership skills. Teens Aloud Foundation remains committed to nurturing future leaders and creating a supportive environment for college-aged students to thrive. Community/Street Outreach: Our team distributed 100 care packages to the unhoused population in the streets of downtown Boston. The packages included essential hygiene items (toothbrushes, toothpaste, menstrual products for women) and shelf-stable meals. Many of the unhoused population we served expressed their heartfelt gratitude to the team of volunteers for the provision. Impact: We empowered students toward academic and personal growth while meeting the immediate physical needs of 100 vulnerable community members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 61% for direct work, and 39% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 47
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 44.1%; rating input score 44
- Program expense ratio: 51.5%; rating input score 51
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 14.3%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.31; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 59.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 54.6% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 72.4% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 44.1% of revenue deployed · 51.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $30K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 44/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 51/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.