Teen Pregnancy Prevention Intervention

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611421413
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2009–2012
Forms available
Form 990 2011, Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Louisville, KY, USA
Phone
5025875001
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Birth Defects, Genetic Diseases Research

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$81,873
Expenses
$106,866
Assets
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2012. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The center for adolescent pregnancy prevention seeks to reduce the risk taking behaviors in adolescents which lead to early sexual debut, spread of disease and teen pregnancy by equiping teens with the knowledge and skills to avoid such behaviors. Capp believes that providing education and health services can greatly reduce these behaviors.

What it reported doing in 2012

Adolescents ages 11-24 receive medically accurate sexual health education, contraceptive services, screening for infection, related treatment and healthy relationship education for males and females. Program participants increase communication with their parents concerning family values, delay sexual debut and increase knowledge about their bodies and decision making. Teens teach other teens healthy decision making thereby becoming role models and community leaders.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 71% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 7
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 8.3%; rating input score 8
  • Program expense ratio: 6.3%; rating input score 6

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -30.5%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -59.9% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -17.9% per year; rating input score 0; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -43.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 8.3% of revenue deployed · 6.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $35K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2009 to 2012
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 8/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.