Teamwork Africa Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462142809
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Eau Claire, WI, USA
Phone
7152718608
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Religion Related N.E.C.
Affiliation
Christianity

Reported finances

Revenue
$158,002
Expenses
$157,012
Assets
$52,116

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mark Halvorsen (Co-founder/spokesman/vice president)

People named in this filing

  • Peggy Halvotsen (Director/board member)
  • Mark Halvorsen (Co-founder/spokesman/vice president)
  • Jason Bierbrauer (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

In Accordance with the Corporation's Articles of Incorporation. The Corporation is Organized Exclusively for Charitable and Educational purposes, Namely, to help establish and fund churches and facilities on the Continent of Africa to help meet the people; s vital spiritual and basic physical needs such a as the Corporation will be operated Exclusively for Charitable, Educational, Scientific or Religious purposes within the meaning of Section 501 (c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.

What it reported doing in 2025

Youth Mentorship program Teamwork Africa has three mentorship programs-Inspire Girls, AG Boys and trauma counseling (for girls). The girls and boys groups meet weekly with up to 30 students in each group. We have four girls groups and four boys groups at three different schools (two groups meet at the same school). There are two trauma counseling groups that each meet twice a month. Approximately 320 students are involved in the mentorship groups.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 93
  • Sustainability: 31
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.6%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.33; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -25.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -15% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 28/100.